mapleleaf726 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

I guess just b/c were are lazy.

jta283 (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

cause were americans an can do what we want

RadarDangerORiley (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

the 084 doesn't have the chain speed you need to effectively cut timber on a production level. for single tree jobs i can see it being a worthwhile saw but for falling big timber on a regular basis i think the 660 works better.

whoismikey (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

I am a forester in England,UK..am confused as to why your stumps are so high..it is the best timber and also makes extraction a hell of a lot safer and easier? You seem to waste a good 4-5 feet of good timber on every tree you yanks fell? is there a reason for this?

ok2b4WoW (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

dont look green to me looks like a right fine cut

coogank (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

i agree thay they dont need to be cutting old growth, but if ur just a tree hugger than your really ignorant

spcascades (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

Hmm. Not too bad. WE used the 084 for that, much more effective.Good to see some video of the bigger stuff coming down.

ccdarrowrun (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

He did a wonderful job. Clearly knew what he was doing. Nobody green would be felling timber of such value. Don't be absurd.

RStabbin (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

Not a very good cutter, looks green to me.

w33dbluntz (January 1, 1970 at 12:59 am)

tree meeeeeeeeeeeeeoooooooooow